Iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm as a complication of hemodialysis vascular access: a descriptive study
Main Article Content
Keywords
Pseudoaneurysm, Arteriovenous fistula, Hemodialysis, Surgical Intervention
Abstract
Introduction: Iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm (PSA) in hemodialysis vascular access puncture site is the most common complication in a patient with ERSD, which needs urgent surgical intervention. This research explained the patients’ characteristics with pseudoaneurysm in vascular access that underwent surgical intervention immediately.
Methods: Retrospectively, it reported cases of pseudoaneurysm that underwent immediate surgical intervention in an operating theatre in the emergency department of RS Dr. Soetomo Surabaya.
Result: Twenty-one patients, whose age range from 26-to 64 years old (mean 46.57 + 12.14 years), have undergone immediate surgical and vascular intervention in an operating theater in the emergency department of RS Dr. Soetomo from 2017 until March 2021. The site of pseudoaneurysm varies from cubiti (90.4%), with signs and symptoms of impending rupture (57.1%), rupture (28.6%), and infected pseudoaneurysm (14.3%). Surgical management such as arterial repair was conducted in 90.4% of cases, and two patients (9.6%) unfortunately underwent takedown AVF. It was found from all 21 cases that nine cases didn’t have vascular access as recommended, leading to repetitive puncture in the same puncture site.
Conclusion: Iatrogenic Pseudoaneurysm in ESRD patients on regular hemodialysis is the most common complication that has been treated. The medical staff’s knowledge about recognition and prevention is a crucial factor in controlling this complication
References
2. Lone H, Ganaie FA, Lone GN, Dar AM, Bhat MA, Singh S, Parra KA. Characteristics of Pseudoaneurysms in Northern India; Risk Analysis, Clinical Profile, Surgical Management and Outcome. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2015;3(2):59-64. doi: 10.7508/beat.2015.02.005.
3. Furukawa H. 2015. Surgical management of vascular access related aneurysms to salvage dialysis access: case report and a systematic review of the literature. J Vasc Access 2015;16(2): 120-125. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000319
4. Saad NEA, Saad WEA, Davies MG, Waldman DL, Fultz PJ, Rubens DJ. Pseudoaneurysms and the Role of Minimally Invasive Techniques in Their Management. RadioGraphics. 2005;25(suppl_1):S173–S189. doi:10.1148/rg.25si055503
5. Prasad TK, Sinha M, Harsha HS, Prasannakumar K, Krishnamoorthy V. Pseudoaneurysms in dialysis access – Outcomes of surgical repair. Indian J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2020;7:245-9
6. Gabriel M, Pawlaczyk K, Waliszewski K, Krasinski Z, Majewski W. Location of femoral artery puncture site and the risk of postcatheterization pseudoaneurysm formation. Int J Cardiol. 2007;120(2):167-71.
7. Chen HZ, Liang WS, Yao WF, Liu TX. Compression methods after femoral artery puncture: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine. 2021;100(4),e24506. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000024506
8. Webber GW, Jang J, Gustavson S, Olin JW. Contemporary Management of Postcatheterization Pseudoaneurysms. Circulation. 2007;115(20):2666–2674. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.681973
9. Al-Jaishi AA, Liu AR, Lok CE, Zhang JC, Moist LM. Complications of the Arteriovenous Fistula: A Systematic Review. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2016;28(6):1839–1850. doi:10.1681/ASN.2016040412